So we've seen the drawings and we've looked at some photographs. Now, let's look at some lists that make sense of the whole thing!
Aircraft With the Lightweight Navigation System (LWNAVS) by Block and Serial Number
As previously mentioned, this was a modification unique to a number of the aircraft assigned to PACAF during the late 1950s and early 1960s and which can be identified by a duct just above the kink in the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer and a fiberglass panel on the left side of the aft fuselage. The mod was apparently done at the squadron or possibly depot level in the Pacific and it seems that no two ducts were 100% alike, although the fiberglass panels were. Doug Barbier spent quite a bit of time tracking down those airframes equipped with the system and has compiled a listing of the airplanes that had the mod. Please note that he isn't entirely certain of its completeness so we aren't either, but it's a significant start and is most assuredly more information than we had before!
F-100D-45-NH:
55-2795, 2837, 2845, 2849, 2853, 2855/56, 2861.
F-100D-50-NH:
55-2865, 2870, 2878-79, 2881, 2883, 2889, 2892, 2901, 2903/04/05.
F-100D-55-NH:
55-2917.
F-100D-20-NA:
55-3502, 3508, 3512, 3516, 3518, 3521/22, 3525, 3528, 3530, 3532, 3534/35, 3541, 3543, 3545, 3549/50, 3553, 3555, 3558/59/60, 3562, 3564, 3566, 3568/69/70, 3572/73/74, 3576, 3580/81/82, 3585/86/87, 3589/90/91/92/93, 3595, 3598, 3600/01.
F-100D-25-NA:
55-3602/03/04, 3608, 3611, 3613, 3615, 3618/19/20, 3622/24, 3625, 3628, 3630/31/32, 3634, 3639/40/41/42, 3647, 3650, 3653.
F-100D-30-NA:
55-3740, 3745, 3762, 3765/66, 3780, 3782, 3784/85, 3793, 3803/04, 3806, 3809, 3811/12/13/14.
F-100D-60-NA:
56-2903.
F-100D-90-NA:
56-3259, 3263/64/65/66/67, 3269/70, 3272/73, 3275/76/77/78/79/80, 3282/83, 3285/86/87, 3320, 3324, 3326/27/28/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36, 3338/39/40/41, 3343, 3345/46.
Aircraft with -NA block numbers were built in Los Angeles while those carrying -NH block numbers were built in Columbus. You probably already knew that but we wanted to be sure...
AGM-12 Bullpup Compatible Aircraft by Serial Number
You would think the AGM-12 Bullpup was the most important air-to-ground missile ever fielded by American military aviation when you see how many kits feature it, but in point of fact its combat history was less than stellar, short in duration, and relatively few aircraft were ever modified with the command guidance equipment necessary for its employment. As far as we know there is no previously published list of which Vietnam War F-100Ds were actually Bullpup capable before this one; Doug spent quite a bit of time auditing photographs, looking for aircraft configured with the guidance antenna under the nose or with the missile hanging off a pylon, and came up with the following list. We make no claim as to its completeness but, as with the list of LWNAVS airframes, it's a start. Just remember when you're looking at photographs of "Huns" from the war years; no guidance antenna equals no capability to employ the missile.
Known Bullpup-Capable F-100Ds by Serial Number, various Block Numbers:
55-2814, 2818, 2821, 2841, 2894, 2903, 3548/49, 3559, 3569, 3603/04, 3622/23, 3655, 3363, 3366, 3376, 3681, 3689, 3695, 3717, 3739, 3774, 3791, 3797, 3884, 3889,
56-2912, 2916, 2928, 2944, 2963, 2979, 2981, 2986, 2989, 2999, 3000, 3011, 3033, 3037, 3054/55, 3063, 3120, 3122, 3162, 3168, 3179, 3239, 3245, 3264/65, 3285, 3305, 3318/19, 3329, 3333, 3335, 3340, 3374, 3379, 3383, 3415, 3425, 3437, 3448, 3462, 3923
Many thanks to Doug for his patience and fortitude looking at all those photographs to assemble this provisional list!
F-100D Units Operating in Southeast Asia 1965-71
Although the F-100 was a critical component of Air Force operations during the war in Vietnam there were never many units assigned to the theater. Here's a brief list, possibly incomplete, of the regular USAF units we know to have been there at one time or another. Remember that this list accompanies an article that's concerned only with the F-100D, at least for now.
3rd TFW at BienHoa AB, Nov '65-Jun '66
510th TFS (CE)
531st TFS (CP)
31st TFW at TuyHoa AB Dec '66- Fall '70
306th TFS (SD)
308th TFS (SE, later SM)
309th TFS (SS)
355th TFS (SP)
416th TFS (SE)
35th TFW at PhanRang AB Oct '66-Spring '71
352nd TFS (VM)
355th TFS (VS)
614th TFS (VP)
615th TFS (VZ)
37th TFW at PhuCat AB Spring '67-Spring '69
355th TFS (HP)
416th TFS (HE)
612th TFS (HS)
Note that this listing does not break out the squadrons by month/year, nor does it detail the way the squadrons jumped around from wing to wing and base to base. The 355th and 416th were both assigned to multiple wings (the 31st and 35th TFWs) during their time in-country. This is a basic listing and we'd like to learn more if you have additional information. Please send any corrections to replicainscaleatyahoodotcom should you feel so inlined.
Early Deployments to Vietnam and Southeast Asia, The Silver Jets
In the spirit of a gift that keeps on giving, Doug continues to come up with things we really need to know about the "Hun" over there. Here's a brief description of the deployment of those silver F-100Ds to the theater:
First deployment were 6x a/c from the 510th TFS from Clark AB RP, to Don Muang A/P Bangkok Thailand 16 Apr 1961 under "Operation Bell Tone", ostensibly to provide air defense for the Thai capital.
18x Squadron sized deployments to Thailand starting 18 May 1962 under "Operation Saw Buck" rotational exercises. First units from Cannon and England AFB's.
After a USN RF-8 Crusader was shot down over Laos on 22 May 1964, 8x F-100D from the 615th TFS (401 TFW England AFB, LA) deployed to Da Nang AB, RVN with Col. George Laven in command. The first F-100 strike against an enemy in-theater was flown on 9 June 1964 against targets in the Plaines des Jarres, Laos.
An additional 8x F-100D from the 615th TFS deployed to Da Nang after the Gulf of Tonkin incident in August 1964. They flew both MIGCAP escort missions with the F-105 and ground attack missions into Laos. In addition, two squadrons deployed from Cannon AFB to South Vietnam following the Gulf of Tonkin incident. 1 ea from the 27th and 474th TFW (effectively at least 3 Hun squadrons in RVN then)
First combat F-100D loss was a/c 56-3085, shot down on 18 Aug 1964 in Laos.
Starting 14 December 1964, Barrel Roll sorties against NVA in Laos.
During the Flaming Dart against NV targets, Huns continued to act as MIGCAP
Operation Rolling Thunder in Mar 1965 - MIGCAP. 4 April 1965, Cpt Don Kilgus (416th TFS) claimed a MIG-17 kill. This was the only time that the F-100's tangled with MIG's. Shortly after that, ground attack south of N. Vietnam only
Aircraft from the 416th TFS Silver Knights deployed to Clark, then to Da Nang in March 1965, then to Bien Hoa mid-June. Nov 1965 Than Son Nhut, then Phu Cat in Apr 1967 and Tuy Hoa in May 1969
481st TFS "Crusaders" from 27 TFW Cannon AFB deployed to RVN under "Operation Two Buck 16" - 16th TDY deployment of F-100s to RVN- on 12 Jun 65. 18x a/c. LTC Harold Comstock CC. Arrived Tan Son Nhut (just outside Saigon) on 21 June 1965 - the first jet tactical fighter unit to be based there. Departed back to CONUS by 27 NOV 1965 but left the jets behind for other units to use!! Most, if not all jets camouflaged by then.
415th TFS from 3 TFW, England AFB, LA replaced 481st, supposedly on a permanent basis. Jets arrived already camouflaged c. mid Nov 1965.
429 TFS Bien Hoa TDY July-Nov 1965 from 474 TFW Cannon AFB, NM
Early TDY's came from PACAF tasked TAC wings or PACAF based wings - Cannon, England, Clark and Misawa known.
The Way They Actually Looked
We're going to make a leap of faith and presume that anyone who's reading this piece is doing it because they want to build a scale model of the F-100D during its time in The SouthEast Asia War Games. Close examination of a great many photographs leads us to several conclusions, which we'd like to share with you.
First, it's incredibly easy to over-weather a model of the F-100D as used in Vietnam. Yes; some were heavily used and yes; they got weather-beaten and heavily stained---SOMETIMES---but more often than not they were kept in relatively decent condition with minimal chipping and overall weathering. If you forced us to a conclusion we'd have to say that the early camouflaged birds, pre-tailcode (1968) were the dirty birds of the family, generally speaking. On the other hand, the bellies of any of the jets could get a little nasty, a condition not helped at all by the white-ish 36622 paint under there after camouflage started being applied, but mostly they looked reasonably well kept. That means---are you ready---that you should look at photographs of airplanes from the unit and time period you're interested in before you begin chipping and staining things, and then weather your model appropriately.
Then there's that darned aft fuselage. The skin was in close proximity to the afterburner that lived back there and paint didn't stay on that area for very long at all, but once again you need to key what you're doing to photographs of the real thing. It's probably better to aim for a modest and convincing burnt paint over stained metal look rather than trying to duplicate entire panels in pretty irridescent colors. That discoloring certainly happened on the "Hun" and you can see vivid examples of it on airplanes that started out unpainted in the pre-war days, back in the '50s and early '60s, but even then you're more likely to see tannish-colored staining rather than the shimmering purples or blues we so often find on scale models.
All of these airplanes will be carrying 335-gallon drop tanks and will have a bent refuelling probe, and they'll all have the "band-aid" reenforcement straps on the wings that live up by the fuselage, just like Monogram gave us in their kit.
By now you've probably figured out that what we're trying to say here is simple: It's easy to look, but sometimes it's hard to see what you're looking at. Photographs are your friend if you've got the sense to use them, but we also know that not everyone has accesses to photographic resources so Doug Barbier came up with a couple of easy rules to define what an F-100D model ought to look like during those different time periods, and they're well-worth sharing:
Early war, in silver paint: Most unit markings are small and on the vertical stab (most of them...), with mission markers and occasional nose art. There won't be a whole lot in the way of antennas but the guidance antenna for Bullpup could be seen on some jets well into 1967. In terms of ordnance, the jets might be carrying AIM-9s on those goofy "Y" launchers, or old (WW2 and Korean War leftovers) bombs, or more contemporary napalm, rocket pods, or SUU-7 cluster bomb dispensers.
The early camouflaged jets (prior to the beginning of tail codes in 1966) are pretty much the same, antenna-wise, as their silver predecessors. Low-drag bombs (the Mk series) are coming on line in both low and high-drag configurations and that faux-ubiquitous M117 that everyone mistakenly puts on their early F-100 models is finally making its appearance. Napalm cans, rocket pods, and CBU launchers are still distinct possibilities.
By 1967-68 new antennae are evident here and there. RHAW gear is possible after 1968 and usually evident after 1970, and post-1968 aircraft in some wings employ TERs on the two inboard wing stations---go back a couple of issues for Joe Vincent's photographic overage of the racks actually fitted to wartime "Huns" and the loads they carried.
Let's Be a Little More Specific
Doug Barbier has been studying the "Hun" in Southeast Asia for a couple of decades now, and has kindly provided this addendum to us:
AGM-12B Bullpup {modifications complete by late 1959, 1st squadron not operational until Dec 1960, only 4 squadrons operational by June 1961 and only approximately 200 a/c actually received it} Out of service by 1966 and guidance antenna & joystick removed by 1967.
Small trapezoidal antenna above intake lip. some by c.1959, but many not until 1966.
Buzz numbers removed from fuselage of all silver F-100s starting by mid-1965, possibly as early as late 1964. Finished by early 1966. 481st TFS was in the process of removing them from their jets in RVN during mid-to-late 1965.
Camouflage paint - started by fall 1965, all completed by mid 1966. Most initial paint jobs carried out by unit painters using fax guidance and were therefore highly individual. Most aft fuselage hot sections were initially painted, but since the paint burned off rapidly, this practice was quickly discontinued.
Aircraft serial numbers & USAF markings went to 6" high letters & numbers on the fin. Initially any combination of white/white, white/black, black/white or white/white could be seen (painters choice) but were later standardized to black USAF over black serial number. Prior to adoption of camouflage paint, the serial number on the tail was painted in black 12" tall numbers and the "U. S. AIR FORCE" lettering on the forward fuselage was painted in Insignia Blue (by T.O. at least) using 15" tall letters. Star and bar markings prior to camouflage were 25" dia on the fuselage sides and 35" dia stars on the lower right wing and upper left wing. After camouflage, 15" diameter stars were generally carried in all positions.
Small trapezoidal antenna below the windshield / cockpit area - added c.1966.
UHF blade antenna below forward fuselage ahead of gun muzzles - added c.1966 but relocated to fuselage spine by 1968 due to frequent breakage.
AN/APR-25(V)/26 RHAW fairings added underneath intake lip and on aft face of vertical fin above fuel dump c.1967-68.
Combat documentation camera capability added starting c.1968.
Band aids on bottom of wing - at the fuselage joint and scab patches on upper fuselage - temporary mods added starting late 1967, replaced by major depot mods possibly stretching through 1970.
Unit Tail codes - added to combat jets in SEA starting c. 1968.
Rotating anti-collision beacon on top & bottom of fuselage added c.1969. The lower recognition light was moved forward when the bottom beacon was added in the original location of the recognition light.
Some a/c had a floodlight under a teardrop shaped housing on the wing, inside of the fence added c.1969.
Note: The small trapezoidal antennas mounted all over the aircraft varied in function and location over time. For example, the F-100 Dash-1 simply calls some of them "identification radar" antennas and does not differentiate between radar beacon nor IFF/SIF usage. The best way from a modeling viewpoint is to simply look at photo's showing where they were located at a particular time on a particular jet and add or delete them as necessary.
Weapons Used By the F-100D in SEA
This was a topic that was slated for another issue but Doug performed that miracle we all participate in from time to time (or at least those of us who research and write do!) and Found Some Files He Thought He'd Lost. As it happens that's a very good thing for Doug and a great one for us so, without further ado:
There are two very important things to remember about weapons carriage that modelers (and model manufacturers) are forever getting wrong. The first is that just because the aircraft was cleared to haul something doesn’t mean that it ever actually DID it in the real world. The second is that armament is not simply hung haphazardly. Armament is chosen for a particular type of target and can only be hung on stations that have been tested and approved to carry that particular store. You can’t just hang anything you want anywhere you want. You’re into fantasy modeling at that point & if you’re going to take that much time & effort to build a great model, you may as well get the stores right as well.
For example, if you were fragged to attack an area target in the Mekong Delta, unfinned nape would be the weapon of choice because it tumbles after release and covers a wider area on impact. If a target is below the jungle canopy, finned nape is the only way to go because they go in straight and can penetrate the trees before exploding. Likewise, the "daisy cutter" fuse extenders on the Mk-82 bombs had a purpose---they caused the bomb to explode higher and spread shrapnel farther, making them a good antipersonnel weapon, while the normal version was better to blow up targets such as buildings and trucks, so there are many combinations of weapons that you would simply never see together on the same jet. There are roughly a dozen full pages in the 1966 pilot’s Dash-1 manual dedicated to what can be hung and where on the F-100D, and I’ll try to simplify them shortly.
Next, which way do the fins go? There are two ways that any finned weapon can be hung on a mounting; either with a “+” (plus) configuration or an “x” (X) configuration when referenced to the ground. The Sidewinders on an F-100D were in a “+” configuration. Note that this is extremely unusual and virtually every other Sidewinder-capable jet carried them in an “X” configuration. All other conventional stores and the 275/335 gal tanks on an F-100 had the fins in an “X” configuration. Finally conventional weapons were nearly always loaded symmetrically, that is the same type weapon on the same station locations relative to each other (outboard & outboard, inboard & inboard, etc.).
One final item before I get off my podium here: ALL published photos of early SEA "Huns" carrying so-called “750” pound bombs are captioned incorrectly. Even though they were commonly called ‘750’s’, they weren’t. The M-117 was the first true 750 lb bomb in the U.S. inventory and it didn’t show up until later in the game. Jets in those early deployments, during the Silver Days back in 1964 and 1965, were hauling around leftover WW2 era AN/M65A-1 1000 lb bombs with conical fins replacing the old WW2 box fins. They were also using leftover Korean war vintage fuses in them, which resulted in a high level of ‘dud’ bombs. And, for a while, there were so few of them available that many times a jet would launch on a mission with only two bombs loaded. The way to tell which bomb is actually being used is to look at the noses. If there were lots of thin yellow stripes, if there were stripes on the aft or mid section of the bomb, if there weren’t any stripes at all, or if it just looked like it had been sitting around weathering in the open for a couple of decades, it was the old M65 (or an M64 – the 500lb version, which was also used early on). The later 750 lb M-117 both looked a lot newer (fresh paint & no weathering) and had only one 2” wide yellow stripe around the body of the bomb, located 3"behind the nose. The newer Mk-8X & M-117 series of bombs did not start dribbling into theater until mid to late 1965 and did not become common until 1966-67 due to expenditures exceeding production rates of the new bombs - there really WAS a bomb shortage.
Given the complexity of the discussion, I'll try to simplify things for us from a basic modeler's perspective. During the conflict in SEA, the standard configuration for F-100D's was a NAA Type I pylon on the inboard wing stations, 335 gallon external tanks on the intermediate points, and a NAA Type III pylon on the outer wing stations. I should mention here that the fuel tanks were integral (one fixed piece) with their pylons and that the pylon was aerodynamically shaped on the leading portion to ensure that the tanks went away from the jet if they were jettisoned, instead of into it. Because of this design feature no truly accurate F-100 pylons for the middle stations exist in plastic or resin.
For most of the war, weapons pylons were left in natural metal and carried a multitude of colored stenciling. The pylons also had unique streamlined "fairings" on the lower sides between the two suspension lugs. As the war progressed, those fairings were cut back in the middle - increasing the drag but making it easier to rapidly hang weapons from them. Some times the pylons were painted during this modification and in that case, the stenciling was minimal or nonexistent.
Some munitions could only be loaded on the outboard wing stations. Examples include the SUU-7 CBU tanks and SUU-25 Flare dispensers. And if you saw a napalm tank loaded on an F-100, it was virtually certain to be a 750 lb variety, either the BLU-1B or the welded case BLU-27. Both finned and unfinned versions were used but generally not mixed on the same aircraft.
Prior to the arrival of the F-4 Phantoms, F-100D's were used on MIGCAP missions, escorting F-105's over North Vietnam. For those missions, the very unique NAA Type IX integrated AIM-9B pylon/launchers were carried in place of the Type I's on the inboard wing stations. From the front, these looked like handed, inverted "Vee's" and each carried two of the early Sidewinder missiles. No pylons were hung on the outboard wing stations but the two 335 gallon external fuel tanks were carried. All these jets were in the silver lacquer paint and not camouflaged.
Late in 1967, many of the jets were modified to be able to load Triple Ejector Racks (TER's) on the inboard pylon. While this did increase the amount of munitions the Hun could carry, it came with additional restrictions on what could be loaded. But by the time the TER's became available in quantity in SEA, the end was near. If you choose to use them, remember that they could only be loaded on the inboard pylons and only one type of weapon could be loaded - no mixing was allowed. Acceptable munitions loads were restricted to 3x Mk-81 (rare) or Mk-82 (common) bombs or 2x unfinned nape cans on the outer stations ONLY.
SEA Combat Loadouts - Changes over Time
The ordnance carried by the F-100D in SEA varied greatly over the years that the "Hun" was at war. Fuel tanks were always carried on the mid-wing stations and neither the 200 gal inboard nor 450 gal ferry tanks were seen in combat and the inboard Type I pylons were always in place except for early war MIGCAP missions and the Type IX pylons replaced them because of the perceived need for an air-to-air weapon, or for the 13 odd sorties where the 481st TFS launched Bullpup missiles from Type X AGM-12-specific inboard pylons.
For attacking ground targets in 1964, leftover WW2 and Korean era munitions were the only things available. The preferred weapon was the 1,000lb M-65 but when those couldn't be had, the 500 lb M64 versions were loaded.
Unfinned napalm was loaded for open country while finned napalm containers were used if they had to be dropped through the jungle canopy.
"Hard" targets in Laos and Cambodia called for 4x M-65's, while "Soft" targets within S. Vietnam, either an M-65 or M-64 inboard with napalm, rockets of SUU-7 CBU (ALWAYS loaded outboard) was common. Occasionally, late in the war, CBU-49 was used if it was available.
Other than a few SUU-7/A pods there were no CBU’s available until mid to late 1965 and that’s about the time the new generation Mk-82 series 500 lb GP bombs and M-117 750 lb GP bombs – both in the slick & retarded (HD or ‘snakeye’) version - started to trickle in as well.
During early 1965, “In Country” loads were frequently 2x LAU-3 rocket pods on the O/B pylons and 2x M65 on the I/B pylons. A 4x M65 configuration was frequently seen, as was napalm I/B and the M65 O/B – or vice versa. As an example, between June and November 1965, the 481st TFS (which was TDY to S. Vietnam from Cannon AFB, NM) expended 3,829 “750” bombs (virtually all of which were the old M65 variety), 1,681 500 lb bombs (again, virtually all being WW2 vintage M64’s), 155 Mk-82 ‘Snakeye’ retarded bombs, 2,952 napalm canisters, 50 LAU-3 rocket pods (that is only 25 jets worth), 646 SUU-7 CBU canisters and 25 AGM-12B Bullpups, (13 missions worth total) in addition to countless rounds of 20mm. Notice that there were lots & lots of napalm & M65’s, fewer 500 pounders and virtually no LAU-3’s or Snake used here. And, if you don’t see it on this list, it never got hung on a Hun in Vietnam in 1964 or 1965 – which was the ‘silver jet’ era.
By late 1966 the old WW2 era bombs were gone, the new munitions were common and the Hun was concentrating on “In Country” missions as the more capable F-4’s and F-105’s took on the dangerous missions up north. As a direct result of the mission change, the combat loads changed as well.
Radar guided, medium altitude “Skyspot” bombing missions generally used 4x
MK-82’s with fuze extenders, while Defense Suppression missions against AAA guns used either CBU-2A or LUA-3 rockets. At this point, “Hard” Targets in Laos and Cambodia rated 4x M-117 ‘slicks’ and the “Soft” targets in the south could be virtually any mix of GP bombs and Napalm, but
were initially 750 Lb M-117 slicks and 750 lb Napalm, or 500 Lb Snake and Napalm.
By 1968 the “fighter pilots friend” –“snake and nape” – became the most common load. Different Wings tended to load these in different locations, so you’ll have to check photos to be certain what your own model should have, but the most common load was a single Mk-82HD inboard with napalm outboard, per wing. However, the 31st TFW seemed to prefer things the other way around. Other common loads would have been 4x Mk-82 HD or slicks, M-117s I/B and nape or LAU-3 rocket launchers O/B. Nape I/B and SUU-7 O/B was seen from 1967 to 1971. In 1971, right at the end of the Hun’s combat life in Vietnam, one aircraft in a section loaded with 4x Nape and a wingman loaded with 4x Mk-82 Snakes became common.
Munitions Colors, Generally Speaking
SUU-7 CBU canisters were painted white in 1964-65 but then switched to olive drab by mid-late 1967 or so.
LAU-3/A Rocket pods were either gloss white (esp early) or olive drab and may have had a red dot on the nose. They virtually always had the aerodynamic nose and tail fairings in place.
Napalm containers (750 lb standard) were almost invarably natural metal and may or may not have carried a 2” wide red stripe near the nose.
M64 & M65 bombs were VERY weathered WW2 olive drab shades and had 3 or 4 thin yellow stripes around either the nose, the tail, or both. They were mated to newer conical fin assemblies (vs the old WW2 ‘box fins’) that were generally a darker shade of olive drab, since they were newer.
Mk-82 & Mk-117 bombs were (fresh) olive drab and had a 2” wide yellow stripe 3” behind the nose of the bomb.
AIM-9B "Sidewinder" missiles were gloss white with clear glass IR seekers.
AGM-12B "Bullpup" missiles were also gloss white overall.
All of these weapons carried stencils and a few carried placards as well. That sort of detail is beyond the scope of this work, but there are a great many examples of each available in photographs both in print and on the internet.
Modeling Aftermarket
You might think that this would be the perfect time for us to list all the stuff that's available to enhance or accurize a model of the F-100, and Doug was kind enough to provide just such an extensive list of what's out there for the airplane, but we're not going to run it today.
With that said, there's quite a bit more aftermarket of all kinds available than you might think, from decals to resin to photo-etched details. That includes the weaponry carried too, and the only areas where accurate aftermarket are not available, at least as far as we know, involve the RHAW gear and the early-war Y-shaped AIM-9 pylons. You can steal RHAW gear that will work, for the nose anyway, from the incredibly complete and extremely expensive DACO detail set for the F-104, but you're on your own for an accurate set of Sidewinder rails for an early-war air-to-air fit. On the plus side, scratch-building that RHAW gear isn't especially hard to do, which matters a lot if you're building a late jet.
And Speaking of RHAW
It's an essential part of the F-100D during its last few years Over There, and it's just not available for your model unless you build in 1/48th and want to steal the sensor from your DACO F-104 improvement kit, and even then you only end up with the one for the nose. Fortunately, it's a simple matter to make a set for your "Hun" using a piece of plastic and a file. Doug was kind enough to provide a dimensioned sketch of the RHAW gear and a couple of photos---look at them closely because they're useful indeed!
Is this a modeler's sketch or what? The thing is, it gives us the shape of the more difficult of the two RHAW installations from a modeler's perspective and does it with dimensions too. You might want to put Doug's picture on the piano for doing this for us! Doug Barbier
Here's that nose RHAW from the left side. Note that the sensors are missing from that blanked-off circular port. Once again, photos are our friend! Doug Barbier
And from head-on. The photo isn't the best but it defines how the nose sensor looks from dead ahead; notice how the sensor openings are stepped rather than on the same plane? Doug Barbier
Finally, here's the RHAW installation back on the tail. Note how it's faceted and not especially big, and how it has the same blanked-out ports for the sensors. The anti-static wick, position lights, and fuel dump mast are all evident here as well. Doug Barbier
Thanks
We'd been thinking of doing this piece for quite a while and a recent urge on my part to build a Vietnam-era F-100D model provided the impetus for the project, but credit needs to go where credit's due; first and foremost to Dave Menard, aka Mister F-100 but also, and substantially, to Doug Barbier, a long-time friend who's been trying to make sense of the nuances of modeling all of the Century Series aircraft for many years---Doug, you ought to write a book! We'd also like to mention Ben Brown, who was successfully figuring out the Monogram F-100D kit long before most of us became interested in it in any serious manner, and Joe Vincent, who has modeled the "Hun", written about it, photographed it, and flown it in combat.
Then there are the guys who shepherd the history and preserve the photography, and who sent images when we asked for them: Don Jay, Jim Sullivan, Mark Aldrich, and Mark Nankivil, in association with The Greater St Louis Air and Space Museum, all responded to requests for images and insight, and we're grateful to them for the help. Thanks, Guys!
Some Final Thoughts
The F-100D isn't a Spitfire or a Mustang, but quite a few kits of it have been issued over the years. Unfortunately, the only one of them that's actually accurate out of the box is the 1980-vintage Monogram kit, which leaves the 1/72nd and 1/32nd scale guys, as well as those who don't like raised panel lines, in the lurch. Keep in mind, however, that everything in this article, which is slanted towards the Monogram kit, has direct application to any of the others and the main thing, the BIGGEST thing, is, yes; to look at photographs and duplicate what you see regardless of which kit you're using.
In terms of the real airplane, we'd like for you to consider this: Much like another North American Aviation product that was active in a war that took place in the same region only 15 years before, the "Hun" was in the Far East in some numbers when the decision was made to send combat aircraft to Vietnam. It had little room for growth even when it was new because it was, after all, the very first of the Century Series family of American jet fighters and in consequence its ability to live in the big war up north became ever smaller as the years passed, but it did its job and it did it well down south, supporting the guys in the mud in all weathers and in darkness. When troops in contact required air support it was, as often as not, the "Hun" that answered the call.
The glory, F-100-wise, and the lasting fame, tended to go to the Misty Fac guys and to the earliest of the Wild Weasels and rightfully so because of the nature of their jobs, using a barely-viable airplane over North Vietnam and doing that job until more capable systems could come on line. Those "Hun" drivers and GIBs earned every single accolade they were given, but don't sell the guys short who were moving the mud in South Vietnam. Theirs wasn't easy work, and it wasn't any safer, just highly dangerous in a different way.
Then there was the ground echelon, the unsung heros who kept the Air Force combat capable throughout the war, often in less than optimal circumstances. Talk to one of those guys now and they'll tell you they were just doing their job and, in so many ways, that's exactly what they were doing, but there was always more to it than that. At the end of the day it was a team, which we so often fail to remember when we build our model airplanes.
This started out as a regular blog with a small F-100D feature article, but things very quickly got out of hand as Doug and I began bouncing ideas off each other and suggesting ways to improve the piece. In short time it assumed the stature of a stand-alone work, almost but not quite a monograph, and morphed into what you see here. We enjoyed doing it and sincerely hope that you enjoyed it as well. Comments, corrections, or additional photography can be addressed in the usual way to replicainscaleatyahoodotcom .
Happy Snaps
Yes indeedy, but we're going to do things a little bit differently this time around and show you one of our photographers being photographed:
Doug Barbier has been a friend for a very long time and is an excellent photographer as well as a noted author and modeler. He's also a retired Air Force and Air National Guard fighter pilot and was photographed flying this F-16 during the time he was with the Michigan ANG, an unusual event for him because he was normally the guy taking the pictures of someone else! It's only fair that you see what he looks like since he was a significant contributor to this special edition of the blog, as well as the sole author of its "let's be more specific" and weapons sections and, perhaps most importantly, as Chief Fact Checker and Sanity Officer. Many thanks to Doug, and we hope you enjoy this issue of the blog as much as we enjoyed putting it together for you.
Stay safe and be good to your neighbor. We'll meet again soon!
Lest we forget...
ReplyDeleteThanks for showing the SUBTLE differences between the F-100's. Built 2 of these kits 20 some years ago for Dad. One was with the straight probe at George AFB, the other bent probe of the 31TFW at Homestead AFB, Florida. Dad joined the Army as a combat engineer with Patton's army, then did occupational time in Germany after the war was over. Then it was off to Korea and when that was over, he joined the Air Force to learn how to repair T-33 engines, eventually working his way to being line chief with the 31st. He didn't go to Vietnam, but 90 days of TDY to Turkey and Spain. Thing is, he never took any photos of those aircraft he worked on.
Outstanding post. As a personal friend of Ben Brown I can attest to his expertise with the 'Hun. Ben has forgotten more than most will ever know. Always enjoy and appreciate your efforts to educate and entertain us.
ReplyDelete